1985 11:25 Sat Jan 9
West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
|
So STOP SAYING IT, it's embarrassing (EMBARRASSING)
Pivotal players? Yes.
Were the England 11 all West Ham? No.
Time to stop it. It's desperate, almost as if we've got nothing else to celebrate as a Club.
SECOND EVER CLUB TO WIN A EUROPEAN TROPHY (after Spurs) is the one I punt out and the other one is WE'RE MOVING TO A UEFA CATEGORY FOUR STADIUM.
So take that (TAKE THAT)
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
ted fenton
5:58 Mon Jan 11
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
If you weren't around then you will never understand.
|
Far East Hammer
5:56 Mon Jan 11
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Captain as West Ham
Both goalscorers were West Ham
Three of the four goals were from near-post crosses (a West Ham-invented move, at Casserati's Café + Chadwell Heath)
4-4-2 formation: developed at West Ham, as an evolution of the formation Hungary had previously used
|
Peckham
11:46 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
AGREED
claret on my shirt 6:44 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
All four goals scored by our players, 3 assists from our players and Bobby Moore lifting the trophy. So fuck off we did win it
|
Livingstone
9:32 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
With regard to the original post Spurs WERE the second club to win a european trophy, you overlook the exploits of West Auckland FC in the Sir Thomas Lipton Trophy in 1909 and then they repeated the feat with a 6-1 mullering of Juventus in 1911
http://www.myfootballfacts.com/Sir_Thomas_Lipton_Trophy.html
*dons tin hat *
|
Far Cough
9:31 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Rattin was a proper cock on that day
Apparently, it almost kicked off after the game as well
|
jack flash
9:16 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
cygnet 4:54
You're absolutely right!
To make matters worse I was at the Wembley q.final when Geoff Hurst scored & Rattin was sent off!
I forgot all about the s.final for some reason!
|
Son of Anarchy
8:51 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Tex...
The sight of Hurst being rolled out with the st george cross for some bookie promotion makes me laugh.
Talk about milking the fuck out of it
|
Pancho
8:44 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Says the 90 year old dribbling retard who fucks corpses.
I'd pipe down Texas judging others you tit.
|
Texas Iron
8:32 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Why is Hurst always a miserable sod in interviews...
Comfortably Set for life...yet comes across s a misery...
Is there something in his life ..we don't know about...???
|
chink
8:00 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
There are very few bits of our songs that are actually true, as many on here have pointed out. Especially for those that get it wrong and sing "They touch the sky".
The only words I can think of that are nearly always true are "Fortune's Always Hiding". However, I have great hopes of Bilic that he will in time make these wrong too.
|
boleynkid
8:00 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
There are even t-shirts out there which say we "won" the world cup so that proves it.
|
Admiral Lard
7:56 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
1985, born 19 years to late you utter tosspot
|
claret on my shirt
6:44 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
All four goals scored by our players, 3 assists from our players and Bobby Moore lifting the trophy. So fuck off we did win it
|
ATBOG
6:31 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Never fails to get a bite from any supporter of any other English team.
|
Sven Roeder
6:20 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Ag ag ag
It is a fact that infuriates supporters of other teams.
I did ask a Chelsea fan, what exactly their club has ever contributed to England at international level and suggested it was NOTHING.
There was no intelligible reply.
|
Far Cough
6:16 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Pickles, the dog that found the Jules Rimet trophy, was a Hammer as well
|
stewey
6:08 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
What was the score : 4:2
Who scored a hatrick: sir geoff hurst
Who scored the other goal: martin peters
Who lifted the jules remet trophy from her majesty the queen:
Sir bobby moore.
So apart from a very very good linesman who else was involved.
I fucking love ramming that down peoples throat.
|
ILOVEPAOLODICANIO
5:50 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Gutted Leicester just equalized 1985 you piece of shit?
|
strong dreams
5:28 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Its no surprise that England have won nothing since. The requirement is for three happy Hammers in the team, one replacing a Spurs player who has had a chip on his shoulder since. Until that is the case, England will not win a trophy.
Some of that may be bollocks
|
cygnet
4:54 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Re: Jack Flash:
Bobby Charlton scored both goals in the semi final.
Hurst scored the only goal in the 1/4 final (from a superb Peters near post cross).
|
SnarestoneIron
4:50 Sun Jan 10
Re: West Ham did not really win the 1966 World Cup
|
Don't be such a twat, it's done tongue in cheek!
If you can compose a song that celebrates us being the 2nd team to win a European trophy, please post it here and maybe we will start singing it!
|
| 
